4 ms·
GNU Kind Communications Guidelines
- the-dude 6y agoThis page is in existence since 2018. To me it is unclear what changed. Is anybody aware of a changelog? ( does archive.org do diffs ? ).
- Shish2k 6y agoI’m not sure anything has changed - people are just looking at RMS and his writing from every possible angle, since we’re all expected to be picking sides in the “RMS rejoins FSF” drama. Since this is “a thing RMS wrote”, then it’s an opportunity to discuss and agree with / attack him over it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- rurban 6y agoBecause the old and recent RMS attacks violate this. And could possibly lead to expulsion.
- notwedtm 6y agoI feel like anyone other than Stallman should have written this.
- pantalaimon 6y agoWhy though? It took Nixon to go to China.
- gnubet 6y agoRMS has also been to China.
- the-dude 6y agoHe should just shut up for a while about ... what exactly? For how long?
- DoofusOfDeath 6y agoI don't understand why the identity of the guidelines' author matters. I would think their suitability is independent of that.
- klyrs 6y agoA common criticism I've seen of him is that he wrote these guidelines, doesn't follow them, and isn't held accountable. I don't follow much of what he says these days, so I wouldn't weigh in on the veracity of all that, but if it's true then the document doesn't carry much weight.
- edoceo 6y agoThe ideas can be good even if the author doesn't follow them perfectly.
- klyrs 6y agoWhen the rules apply differently to some members of the community and not others, it's toxic and the community suffers. I'm not saying anything about the quality of the document.
- edoceo 6y agoI hear you on that, you stated: > ""and isn't held accountable"" But, isn't RMS currently in the process of being "cancelled" (as the awake kids say). Isn't that some accountability (even if it's not the specific type one would like to see)?
- klyrs 6y agoDid you see where I said that I'm not weighing in on those particulars? That's because I don't consider myself well-informed of the particulars, and I'm trying to address points of genuine curiosity without wading into the minefield. Sorry if that's unsatisfactory
- dvfjsdhgfv 6y agoWhy? I had several communications with Stallman. Based on other people's opinions, I expected a total weirdo, whereas he was always kind, respectful and and always very reasonable. What struck me was that when faced with a problem, he was genuinely trying to find a solution. What was shocking to me was that I expected he would shove his opinions up people's throats, but the opposite was true. During one conference one guy got heated up about licensing and cried "No, I don't agree with you!" Stallman looked at him calmly and said, "That's fine, you are you, I am me, we are different persons, there is no law that says we have to always agree on everything."
- edoceo 6y agoI feel like this is your opportunity and look forward to reading your guidelines.