I'm disappointed by the fact that article uses "an ex googler made a tweet and twitter hasn't taken it down as misinformation" as evidence. I thought that sort

I'm disappointed by the fact that article uses "an ex googler made a tweet and twitter hasn't taken it down as misinformation" as evidence. I thought that sort of right-wing website didn't think twitter should be "the arbiters of truth"? And obviously that signal doesn't work in that direction.