5 ms·
> the "air flow" argument is the key to this. I would point out that cars have gears, but then someone would say that in the US they do not, and I would have t
by prof-dr-ir 6y ago
> the "air flow" argument is the key to this.
I would point out that cars have gears, but then someone would say that in the US they do not, and I would have to explain that that is not the case, actually, and it would all get very tiring very quickly.
> Who are the experts on emDrive tech, and what principle does the emDrive violate?
A physicist would point out that momentum is conserved, so nothing can start moving without something else moving in the opposite direction, but then someone would point out that cars seem to be able to do just that, and then I would point out this big round thing underneath a car, and it would all get very tiring very quickly.
- Chris2048 6y ago> I would point out that cars have gears How does that relate to airflow?
- j4yav 6y agoIt doesn’t have anything to do with airflow but does with whether or not cars are faster in reverse.
- Chris2048 6y agoBut it's a response to me pointing out air-flow is relevant (key).
- j4yav 6y agoHe is saying that air flow is not more important than gearing, but if he were to raise it he’d end up in a never ending series of replies debating the details but missing the point.
- Chris2048 6y agoSure, but I don't agree gearing is in the same category of the specific thing I mentioned. Would he also end up in a never-ending series of replies wrt airflow too? If not, it has nothing to do with my point, if so why change the topic..
- j4yav 6y agoApologies but I don’t really want to enter the endless debate either.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]