5 ms·
It may well be true, but it's a little odd (to someone who has only ever had one windows computer) to hear them say things like "in a way that we consider to be
by tobylane 15y ago
It may well be true, but it's a little odd (to someone who has only ever had one windows computer) to hear them say things like "in a way that we consider to be overly permissive" and "relies too heavily on third parties to secure the web experience". Take out web of this, and it's the exact feelings we had about XP security.
Do they have a non-propriety alternative? The closest thing I can think of is WPF, which is based on Directx.
- bad_user 15y agoit's the exact feelings we had about XP security Well, actually, Linux or OS X security isn't that much better for the end-user, unless you're a sysadmin with some experience and know how to configure stuff like IPTables and SELinux. Otherwise when navigating the web, security is as better as its weakest links - the user and its browser.
- tobylane 15y agoI mean in terms of how many backdoors are left, unpatched, in programs that inevitably have direct access to the internet, and admin rights.