3 ms·
Seems the intent is to clearly separate commentary from code. I could see that being intentional, imagine cursive annotations on a printed document.
by vajrapani666 6y ago
Seems the intent is to clearly separate commentary from code. I could see that being intentional, imagine cursive annotations on a printed document.
- caslon 6y agoIt's not actually cursive though! It's seemingly-random cursive/print mix.
- alpaca128 6y agoHow is cursive for lowercase and normal italic for uppercase random? That said it's a font thing, others may do it more consistently if you're into that.
- caslon 6y agoIt's not cursive for lowercase. Look at "which." The glyphs are just randomly cursive or print. I wasn't complaining about serifs, I was complaining about randomly mixing cursive and print.