> there's been a pretty clear and consistent (if poorly defined) goal of human-like intelligence. You don't think performing arithmetic and playing chess could

> there's been a pretty clear and consistent (if poorly defined) goal of human-like intelligence. You don't think performing arithmetic and playing chess could ever have been thought of as requiring human-like intelligence? See https://www.leanix.net/en/blog/what-is-the-difference-between-artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning https://www.leanix.net/en/blog/what-is-the-difference-betwee... Excerpts: Artificial intelligence has been around for ages, with it even being used in the Greek mythology to express human like machines which copied man’s behaviour. At the beginning, even early computers were considered logical machines as they were able to reproduce “intelligent” capabilities such a arithmetics and memory… Engineers of that era saw it as an attempt to create mechanical brains. Nowadays, something as “trivial” as a calculator function, does not go hand in hand with our current concept of Artificial Intelligence.