4 ms·

Honestly though, what about any of Google's behavior in the past several years should make us give them the benefit of the doubt?

• uoaei 6y ago
  The fact that it is an immense and heterogeneous organization with many different decision-makers at all levels with varying priorities and intentions. Essentializing Google as a singular agent obscures this perspective and gives no credence to those who are trying to push it in better directions from the inside.
  • tehjoker 6y ago
    Anything like a major PR campaign is approved at the highest levels. EDIT: I'd also note that in the book Surveillance Capitalism, Zuboff discusses how Pokemon Go was seen in investor circles as a successful demonstration of manipulating masses of people to go to commercial spaces by luring them with imaginary characters. This sent market caps soaring. When I saw this headline, I immediately thought that this is them doing that with maps, but in a PR friendly way.
    • uoaei 6y ago
      And how is any of this a new concern? This issue existed long before these new features and will continue to be a threat long after. I really don't see how this is comparable considering they could just as easily have done the same without greenwashing.
  • flukus 6y ago
    > Essentializing Google as a singular Google themselves do this with their shared branding under the google umbrella. Companies that want the upside of this branding need to accept the downsides too.