3 ms·
I feel like the "max 14 days per year" put the slam down on 2 days home / 3 days office everyone said would happen.
by jpeg_hero 6y ago
I feel like the "max 14 days per year" put the slam down on 2 days home / 3 days office everyone said would happen.
- Schweigi 6y agoHeck, it's not even good enough for 1 day at home per week. It's basically only useful for cases where you need to stay home because of a sick kid or someone is coming over for house repair/maintenance.
- hedora 6y agoI’ve never worked somewhere where that sort of thing was tracked. It sounds like Google will be tracking moving forward. Uggh.
- ipaddr 6y agoNot if you choose to not opt in. If you choose to not opt-in you will still take those days but you will be unable to work from home around whatever emergency or appointment you have. It's a trick.
- beisner 6y agoThe article is ambiguous about that. One interpretation is "max 14 days of remote work per year where you can't be in the office 3 days a week" (which is separately mentioned later in the article).
- bootsz 6y agoThe article is wrong. The 14 day limit applies only to working from a different country than the one your job is based in. Partial WFH is very much still on the table for the foreseeable future as far as we know.