> but the nlrb is a supposedly neutral organization You must be kidding me. NLRB has known pro-union bias, which becomes especially acute under Democratic adm

> but the nlrb is a supposedly neutral organization You must be kidding me. NLRB has known pro-union bias, which becomes especially acute under Democratic administration (it was a bit different under Trump but that has passed). https://www.hrdefenseblog.com/2021/02/non-union-employers-beware-the-nlrb-pendulum-is-pushed-pro-union/ https://www.hrdefenseblog.com/2021/02/non-union-employers-be... https://www.nexsenpruet.com/insights/national-pro-union-policy-shift-has-begun https://www.nexsenpruet.com/insights/national-pro-union-poli... https://www.politicususa.com/2021/01/20/joe-biden-just-fired-trumps-anti-union-nlrb-lawyer.html https://www.politicususa.com/2021/01/20/joe-biden-just-fired... https://www.labordaysblog.com/2021/03/are-unions-primed-for-a-comeback/ https://www.labordaysblog.com/2021/03/are-unions-primed-for-... > You have to choose some cut off for security over cost and time Nobody asked for 2000 National Guard troops and Fort Knox security on it. What was asked for is one puny webcam. A school kid wouldn't have trouble setting it up. If anything isn't acting in good faith is pretending this is about costs.