3 ms·
> it's nothing more than a ultra-scaled neural network as we currently use them You state this as if it is an undisputed/obvious fact, but it isn't.
by omnicognate 6y ago
> it's nothing more than a ultra-scaled neural network as we currently use them
You state this as if it is an undisputed/obvious fact, but it isn't.
- Sebb767 6y agoIt does not matter for my point. Even if our NNs miss some part of neuron function, it would look comparable to a simple if/a multiplication on the smallest level. My point is that the complexity/intelligence comes from size; just because our algorithms adapt minimally or accept pre-defined scenarios, does not mean that they are fundamentally unintelligent because we're able to fully understand them.