3 ms·
On the contrary, they're both things that should obviously be illegal. The question is why aren't things that should obviously be illegal not actually illegal.
by thereare5lights 6y ago
On the contrary, they're both things that should obviously be illegal.
The question is why aren't things that should obviously be illegal not actually illegal. I answered that question. However, it seems like some people reflexively support the police so they don't read past the surface.
- TeeMassive 6y agoYour example is a glitch, of law, the other is obvious on its face.
- thereare5lights 6y ago> Your example is a glitch, of law, No it's not. In the past, it was lumped in with the right of cops to have sex with suspect, thus it was intentional to allow cops to catch sex workers. Calling it a glitch only shows how little people care about that particular problem and in fact reinforces my argument.