I'm not sure how you arrived at that conclusion. Does having to pee in a bottle sound more like "having your humanity denied" or "having your money denied"? Wha

I'm not sure how you arrived at that conclusion. Does having to pee in a bottle sound more like "having your humanity denied" or "having your money denied"? What about the actual example from the GP, having your stock options clawed back? Which one of those categories does that fit in? And then, as to my point, what about RMS's pattern of sexual harassment? Which category does that fall in? Sure, he denied raises too. But that's not why people are upset with his reinstatement, and not anything more than one single example in the story being discussed. It feels deceptive to focus on that one detail and ignore everything else that makes RMS a bad person to work with.