3 ms·
One of the most fair way to handle group projects grading was in my capstone business management course. At the end, the 6 of us each had to (privately) rank ev
by rrrrrrrrrrrryan 6y ago
One of the most fair way to handle group projects grading was in my capstone business management course. At the end, the 6 of us each had to (privately) rank everyone else according to their contribution, and the assessment by your peers was 20% of the grade for the project.
Because someone had to come in last place, it eased a lot of the tension and created a much more pleasant group dynamic:
- The free-rider(s) were perfectly okay with jumping on the grenade, filling the last-place spot, and knocking 20% off their final grade in exchange for doing very little work and still passing the class.
- The lazier people who did care about their grade were a bit more motivated to contribute than they otherwise would've been.
- The go-getters who wanted to ace the class felt like they were fairly compensated for doing most of the heavy lifting.
- mettamage 6y agoI wonder how a group of pure go-getters would fare on a grade structure like this.
- jdavis703 6y agoWe had a fairly similar grading program in my IT capstone project. The professor made it clear that if a group had either a total grifter or was an all-star team exceptions could be made. We had to give lots of presentations and question and answer sessions. It was generally pretty clear to the entire class which students were slackers and couldn't answer questions and which ones knew their stuff.