3 ms·
JCVI-Syn3A has been around for a while. Here is the genome sequence from 2018 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1241355755 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuc
by koeng 6y ago
JCVI-Syn3A has been around for a while. Here is the genome sequence from 2018 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1241355755 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1241355755
Back at FreeGenes we synthesized all of the genes from this organism with codon optimization for Escherichia coli (https://stanford.freegenes.org/collections/gene-sets/products/jcvi_syn3-0#description https://stanford.freegenes.org/collections/gene-sets/product...), the workhorse of synthetic biology. If you combine the right transcriptional and translational elements, you should be able to build a fully modular genome from this gene set! We also did a couple other organisms in pursuit of this modular genome. As a nice bonus, you can also easily do in-vitro cell-free experiments since the codon tables are nice (and I've heard from Kate Adamala's group that JCVI-Syn3 has pretty bad cell free, though that was a couple years ago)
It's important to note that JCVI-Syn3A has a LOT of problems when it comes to its practical use. There just isn't enough energy being put into making an understandable and practical modular/minimal genome.
- mercurywells 6y agoWhat is "pretty bad cell free"?
- koeng 6y agoIf you burst open the cells and extract all the goop inside, you can use that goop to express proteins. For certain organisms, like E.coli, this works quite well, and you can get a significant amount of protein. For others, like JCVI-Syn3, the goop sucks at expressing protein. So it’s a “pretty bad cell free” [expression platform]