4 ms·
I was under the impression that the US "easily" dominated Iraq's institutional armed forces, toppling their government and "winning" (Mission Accomplished). Wha
by doyoulikeworms 15y ago
I was under the impression that the US "easily" dominated Iraq's institutional armed forces, toppling their government and "winning" (Mission Accomplished). What we're doing very poorly, though, is occupying and policing the region, now that we've taken care of the previous government.
In the case of war with the Soviet Union, I'm guessing that there was heavy emphasis on dealing with nuclear war or full-scale land combat in Europe, with the primary objective of beheading and toppling the Soviet control structure.
By contrast, in Iraq, our goal is (apparently) to occupy and subdue the entire region, which is a different, difficult problem.
- gaius 15y agoThis is why I was very careful to say Gulf War 1! But the problem with Gulf War 2 was another Cold War assumption, that was nothing to do with equipment or tactics or indeed anything directly military: that the people of Iraq would welcome their liberators, in the way that the people of the former Soviet-occupied have embraced the West after the fall of the Berlin Wall.
- doyoulikeworms 15y agoAh, whoops. My mistake. So much for a simple example to illustrate my point :)