The easiest counter argument to that is that transition to proof-of-stake based Crypto should be encouraged. But the article only makes sweeping statements wit

The easiest counter argument to that is that transition to proof-of-stake based Crypto should be encouraged. But the article only makes sweeping statements without much depth. . "Cryptocurrencies disproportionately victimize vulnerable people and those in marginalized communities without access to traditional investments or financial advisory" The same could be said about large segments of the traditional finance and banking industry. Yet nobody wants a blanket ban of this sector. It is a very low effort article, that has a very clear bias.