I know we're supposed to assume good faith here, but this article really reads like an instance of Poe's law. In any case, I'm completely baffled at the sugges

I know we're supposed to assume good faith here, but this article really reads like an instance of Poe's law. In any case, I'm completely baffled at the suggestion to verify behaviour for each minor change by just running through every feature manually and inspecting the responses at breakpoints. Wow, I wonder if this could be automated... And I guess "accept that failures just happen and deal with the consequences" (which is arguing against a strawman; nobody thinks we can prevent all failures, most just think we can prevent some of them) just assumes that you're not going to lose money when your checkout page is broken and it's the middle of the night, or important clients lose data.