3 ms·
Two thoughts. One strong agree on nuclear, though generally being against nuclear probably also entails not understanding the magnitude of our co2 issues (eg un
by cloverich 6y ago
Two thoughts. One strong agree on nuclear, though generally being against nuclear probably also entails not understanding the magnitude of our co2 issues (eg unless you want to reduce quality of life drastically, nuclear now).
But re adapting to changing climate, the issue is we can’t adapt to something like the predicated changes, a significant chunk of the earth would become unlivable. Mass migration and food supply changes abound. unless by adapt you mean “mass death” which historically had been how we’ve (life) adapted. But if you are against your family dying, younn b probably want to figure out this climate thing ;)
- shakezula 6y agoIt's not just that we can't adapt either - it's the time scales we're working with. We might not have time to adapt before literally millions of people are displaced or even die.