I'm ok with "code intelligence", or even more precisely "autocomplete based on code intelligence". All good. Just not "intellisense", please ;) > I personally

I'm ok with "code intelligence", or even more precisely "autocomplete based on code intelligence". All good. Just not "intellisense", please ;) > I personally wouldn't go back from VSCode to an editor that merely provides autocompletion Autocompletion can draw from multiple sources. By default, before LSP hooks have a chance to add themselseves to the list, I have following sources configured: '(ac-source-symbols ac-source-variables ac-source-functions ac-source-features ac-source-filename ac-source-abbrev ac-source-dictionary ac-source-words-in-same-mode-buffers ac-source-semantic ac-source-yasnippet ac-source-files-in-current-dir) Maybe that's why I don't think changing the name of the feature based on just the source it uses makes sense.