> To be fair, there isn't one Uber-bin Damning with faint praise? :) While an uber-bin would be a bigger problem, there is a reason why I italicized "tightly-c

> To be fair, there isn't one Uber-bin Damning with faint praise? :) While an uber-bin would be a bigger problem, there is a reason why I italicized "tightly-coupled". Often many people simply respond with "but there are multiple binaries",† which kind of misses the point. > Tell me, a naive one, why a throwaway for this? It was created 2017-01-01. † Edit: Case in point, see sibling comment: "These are separate services, with separate binaries, with separate packages […]" * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26646250 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26646250