4 ms·
To be fair, there isn't one Uber-bin, but that doesn't change the fact that all these systems are now in lock step and under the control of one group. Tell me,
by anotherhue 6y ago
To be fair, there isn't one Uber-bin, but that doesn't change the fact that all these systems are now in lock step and under the control of one group.
Tell me, a naive one, why a throwaway for this?
- throw0101a 6y ago> To be fair, there isn't one Uber-bin Damning with faint praise? :) While an uber-bin would be a bigger problem, there is a reason why I italicized "tightly-coupled". Often many people simply respond with "but there are multiple binaries",† which kind of misses the point. > Tell me, a naive one, why a throwaway for this? It was created 2017-01-01. † Edit: Case in point, see sibling comment: "These are separate services, with separate binaries, with separate packages […]" * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26646250 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26646250
- tored 6y ago> under the control of one group Exactly.
- barkingcat 6y agoWhy do you assume a throwaway?