11 ms·
Y Combinator's Graham Says Startups Must Improve Lives
- ihodes 15y agoI'm reminded every time I watch Bloomberg I'm reminded just how high quality they are, and how intelligent their anchors are relative to any other large media corp. Additionally, Paul, thanks for being frank and great. It makes me so happy to see you as the face of not only YC, but increasingly of tech startups in general. When I get around to implementing a good idea, I've got you to look to not only for interesting me in programming through Lisp, startups through YC, but also for increasingly the visibility and viability of tech startups. Definitely worth watching all 14 minutes. EDIT: Also, still a little bitter over "the real money's in hotel search"… dzoblin's & my Summer '11 (I think) YC application was that. Though admittedly not far along, and the idea was still in development. still ;)
- haberman 15y agoNo kidding. I have to admit when I saw Emily Chang give her opening spiel, having never heard of her or Bloomberg, my mind immediately put her in the "vapid TV personality" bucket. But over the next minute or two I realized that was a complete mistake, and was extremely impressed with how sharp she was. I don't even think I was aware of how low my expectations of TV anchors are.
- workhorse 15y agoI felt the EXACT same way. She really did a great job.
- rdl 15y agoI've been driving 1-2h/day recently, and Bloomberg on satellite radio is one of the better parts of that. (BBC is nice too, and sometimes CNBC, but CNBC's quality varies greatly).
- lupatus 15y agoI listen to Bloomberg radio[1] most days at work. Lots of insightful interviews and analysis of business, economics, politics, and current events. [1]http://tunein.com/tuner/?StationId=17075& http://tunein.com/tuner/?StationId=17075&
- sixtofour 15y agoThe improve lives through startups meme is a valuable idea, but finding tunein.com has improved my life in a small but delightful way.
- lupatus 15y agoI like radio because it is random and unexpected - to me. I don't have to set a playlist of any sort or even own the rights to play the song. I used to listen to Pandora mainly for that randomly played music. I rarely even vote on Pandora and hate when it asks me to. Now that Pandora has listening caps, I barely use it. A guy at worked pointed me to tune-in, and it is now my site of choice for online music/radio/whatever.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- dzlobin 15y agoWe'll show pg & co. what they missed out on! :-)
- Goladus 15y agoAt least one of the taglines was a huge mis-characterization of what was actually said, though. "Paul Graham: Don't look at groupon's numbers" That's not what he said at all. He said that HE wouldn't, and that he'd bet on Andrew Mason because he knows him to be a smart guy (using PG's definition of smart). It wasn't giving advice except perhaps in the general sense of "bet on good people."
- PanosJee 15y agoYeah but Groupon is not on the "bet" level and IPOs are different that seed or series-A funding.
- Goladus 15y agoYeah that's the whole point. He's not giving advice at all, he's just talking about his general approach to investment. It was Bloomberg that took the comment turned it into implicit commentary about the IPO, which was clearly not his intent.
- Mizza 15y agoNever seen PG talk before, figured he'd be another west-coast asshole, but he seems super down to earth!! Think I might apply to YC now..
- anamax 15y agoPG is an east-coast transplant.
- justin 15y agoFYI: If you think everyone on the west coast is an asshole you'll probably not be very productive living here and doing YC.
- Mizza 15y agoTotally valid point, and everybody should be given a fair shake, it's just that a lot of the people I've met from the west coast startup scene seem very pretentious (and I'm quite sure I'm not the only person out east who feels that way.) Paul doesn't seem that way at all in this video, however, in fact he seems incredibly down to earth. I found this surprising and refreshing, and it makes me think that I have a misconception about the scene out there, and that I would like to experience it now to decide for myself.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- aymeric 15y agoLoved the questions Emily Chang asked, she seems sharp.
- marcamillion 15y agoIt's so interesting how PG answered that GroupOn question. He dodged giving GroupOn his stamp of approval, but hedged by approving Andrew Mason. That's definitely an interesting approach, especially for someone like him. Edit: Also...that TechStars response...talk about awkward. Definitely good questions from both hosts though.
- ryannielsen 15y agoActually, that's fairly consistent for pg. As he notes later in the interview, he believes that a startup's founders matter more than the idea as good founders will improve upon or drop a bad idea. I think that was exactly the heuristic pg used in this case. He may not think GroupOn is best company in its current form, but he believes that Andrew Mason's smart and driven and is thus capable of evolving GroupOn into a solid and profitable business.
- staunch 15y agoI think betting on the founder breaks down as a company grows to a certain point. Steering a small startup is one thing. Steering a 10k person public company is entirely different. I doubt Steve Jobs at age 26 could have saved Apple from impending doom in 1996. Even at age 41, with all his additional skill/experience, it was far from easy for him.
- davidw 15y agoYeah, the overlap of people who are good at doing something from nothing and the group of people who are good at managing a large organization is probably pretty small. Bill Gates and Steve Jobs come to mind. That said, from PG's point of view as an investor, the important thing is to get to an exit, and hope that for the sake of the company, part of what makes the founders 'good' is the ability to recognize when it's time to step aside.
- ryannielsen 15y agoMaybe, maybe not. I honestly don't have enough info to feel I can make an assertion either way. My gut does say, however, that many of the same traits are required of both startup CEOs and 10k employee public company CEOs. The challenges are indisputably different, but a CEO who's tenacious, intelligent, creative and driven will find ways to surmount any challenge whether it's hiring the first employee or executing a billion dollar take-over. Fair questions: would Apple be facing impending doom in 1996 if Jobs hadn't been ousted and instead been allowed to lead his company? Would that Apple be as successful today?
- qF 15y ago'Improving lives' is ambiguous, it centralizes around solving problems that people have. However if you scale these problems from 1st world to 3rd world problems it seems to me that improving lives in this context is aimed more at 1st rather than 3rd world problems. Which makes sense from a business standpoint, but the title somewhat implies that is about making the world a 'better' place. I am not criticizing pg because I strongly believe that it is a winning strategy when talking about startups, just take improving lives with a grain of salt. I'd love to actually improve lives, but unless you can take the Bill Gates route (earn billions, do charity work), it's not easy to do so from behind a computer, writing code. Are there any startups taking the route of actually improving quality of life?
- mthreat 15y agoPG discusses this at about the 5m mark in this video, using the example of curing Malaria: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7K0vRUKXKc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7K0vRUKXKc
- gibybo 15y agoWhile making the world a better place may not be sufficient to build a successful business, I don't think it's fair to say only organizations focusing on the third world are improving quality of life. Companies usually don't make money unless they are helping someone, and that help often leads to an improved quality of life, first world or not.
- qF 15y agoI specifically chose to talk about a scale, because I do agree that it is not black and white. There is however a difference between: earning money as a goal and improving lives as a means (improved quality of life being a byproduct) and wanting to improve lives (and as such quality of life) and earning money only being a requirement to sustain those activities. But perhaps startups are not way to go for the latter, which is why I am curious if there are any startups taking this route (or perhaps have tried and failed).
- 15y ago
- teej 15y agoThe question I wanted them to ask is "How do you identify great founders?". Every question they asked led to "YC picks founders, not the business". If it's all about the people, I want to hear more about how he evaluates them.
- earbitscom 15y agohttp://www.paulgraham.com/founders.html http://www.paulgraham.com/founders.html
- jseliger 15y agoFortunately, he wrote a whole essay on that very subject: http://paulgraham.com/founders.html http://paulgraham.com/founders.html . It's the fourth from the top on his "Essays" page: http://paulgraham.com/articles.html http://paulgraham.com/articles.html .
- hzay 15y agoI felt he deliberately did not go into this topic. He was asked "How do you pick ~60 out of ~2000 applications?", and his entire response could be paraphrased as "We have practice". It made me wonder if it was because he thought it was too complex a topic for a quick TV show.
- pg 15y agoI wrote about how I read applications here: http://ycombinator.com/howtoapply.html http://ycombinator.com/howtoapply.html http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=801739 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=801739
- hzay 15y agoI wasn't suggesting that you were unwilling to divulge this information. I meant that I felt you did not wish to discuss it in that forum.
- someperson 15y agoSemi-related: The YC application for Dropbox from the link above seems to have been taken down. Does anyone have a mirror?
- yuvadam 15y agoI'd really like to hear about pg's gripes with TechStars.
- staunch 15y agoBackstory as I understand it: David Cohen asked PG's permission to start a YC franchise of some sort in Boulder. He said no. David Cohen cloned YC in virtually every respect (down to copying the application form). Basically what Wimdu is doing to AirBnb. Still, it has been 5 years and YC has certainly not suffered. I'm surprised PG isn't a bit more magnanimous towards them.
- cantbecool 15y agoImitation is the greatest form of flattery. I don't think PG cares too much.
- davidw 15y agoHe didn't give that impression in the video. It's too bad, because Techstars seems like a pretty cool thing in its own right. To me, Boulder also sounds way more attractive than the Bay Area at this stage in my life.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- cantbecool 15y agoI guess PG simply didn't want to be bothered with questions regarding his competitors. I agree with your sentiment. Boulder seems more attractive than the Bay Area, and I'm rather young.
- johnx123 15y agoWe need more YC. YC is rejecting every applications. So, TS is good, IMHO. But, his remark "they find people" is more arrogant.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- cantbecool 15y agoFirst time I've ever heard the word suck on Bloomberg. I love Graham's demeanor. Emily Chang and Cory Johnson seemed lost on air, check out 7:02 in, when Graham responded with succinct and honest answers. He didn't over-hype Y Combinator and emphasized the human aspect of startups: startups must make peoples lives better and hiring good, intelligent people are the keys to success.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- jmitcheson 15y agoI loved this quote (I'm paraphrasing) Reporter: What kills young startups? PG: The back button Brilliant
- ntoshev 15y agoPG says the first iteration doesn't matter much as long as the founders are good and iterate quickly. Empirically, is this the case? Airbnb and Dropbox certainly didn't iterate on their concepts that much. Google's first shot was excellent. Facebook captured 90%+ from Harvard students before moving on to conquer the world. Are there real counterexamples, or even better, hard data? (If only YC recorded and aggregated key metrics from their startups, it would be so much easier to answer such questions)
- neebz 15y agoData would be helpful, I agree. But sometimes in iterations, you end up totally changing the product. So you might be thinking this is the first iteration of Groupon but it wasn't, the first iteration was The Point which really didn't work out and no one knows about it.
- brandnewlow 15y agoAirbnb's first iteration was presented as being much more about actually renting air mattresses and couches in people's home. They iterated into ebay for spaces. Dropbox's first iteration was a one-guy team working on the problem. The founder iterated into a two-founder team based on feedback. I'd say that's a significant iteration. If you read The Facebook Effect, Facebook was simply the latest in a line of "fun hacks" Zuckerberg unleashed on his fellow students at Harvard, each one building on the next. Sounds like every one of these projects involved iteration. It's fun to think awesomeness springs fully-formed from one's forehead, Zeus-like, but I don't that happens to often in practice.
- stdbrouw 15y agoReplace "iterate" with "kept working on and improving" and your comment makes just as much sense: any company, old or new, evolves and tries out new things and abandons other things that don't work — in that sense, saying iteration is crucial to startups is pretty much just a tautology. I think PG was hinting at the fact that for startups, iterating often means pivoting, so your first iteration doesn't necessarily lock you into path dependency. Which is a lesson that doesn't really apply to Facebook or Dropbox or Google, because they got the general direction right the first time.
- egerger 15y agoONLINE STORE : ====( http://www.etradinglife.com http://www.etradinglife.com )===== The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike,jordan,prada,, also including the jeans,shirts,bags,hat and the decorations. All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment.,after the payment, can ship within short time. free shipping competitive price any size available accept the paypal jordan shoes $32 nike shox $32 Christan Audigier bikini $23 Ed Hardy Bikini $23 Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15 ed hardy short_tank_woman $16 Sandal $32 christian louboutin $80 Sunglass $15 COACH_Necklace $27 handbag $33 AF tank woman $17 puma slipper woman $30 ====( http://www.etradinglife.com http://www.etradinglife.com )=====
- egerger 15y agoONLINE STORE : ====( http://www.etradinglife.com http://www.etradinglife.com )===== The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike,jordan,prada,, also including the jeans,shirts,bags,hat and the decorations. All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment.,after the payment, can ship within short time. free shipping competitive price any size available accept the paypal jordan shoes $32 nike shox $32 Christan Audigier bikini $23 Ed Hardy Bikini $23 Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15 ed hardy short_tank_woman $16 Sandal $32 christian louboutin $80 Sunglass $15 COACH_Necklace $27 handbag $33 AF tank woman $17 puma slipper woman $30 ====( http://www.etradinglife.com http://www.etradinglife.com )=====
- jasontan 15y agoironically, we ran into PG & JL downtown right after he did the interview. while we were lugging cinema displays...
- delinquentme 15y agoPG: ballsy enough to wear two popped collars? i hope he won some money on that bet.
- natural219 15y agoThis interview defines me. Paul Graham exemplifies software entrepreneurship: "Make something people want." Cory Johnson, herald of the old guard: "Make users wade through bullshit; make ad revenue." You are dead, bullshit business man. Welcome to my century.
- Goladus 15y agoI am pretty sure Cory was not advocating click-throughs to generate ad revenue, in fact he seemed to be specifically trying to frame that particular approach as being vulnerable to competition. The key question of course being, how can hipmunk actually make money doing this?
- natural219 15y agoI did not get the same impression other HN'ers did, I noticed. To me Cory sounded smug and know-better, but maybe that's what I expected out of him. I'll watch it again.
- Goladus 15y agoOh he definitely he sounded smug and know-better, he's a professional TV personality and his audience is not typically hackers. But I think that's more a reflection of him not actually caring deeply about topic more than true conviction. That comment was just a set-up for the truly interesting question.
- wensing 15y agoI like how PG surprises the male interviewer with his non-traditional filters for good investments.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- Geekette 15y agoPG, your enthusiasm is crazy infectious. Loved the clip.
- int3rnaut 15y agoWhat I like best about what Graham says is the idea that good people will persevere and do good things to make peoples lives better and that he's willing to bet on these good people. That's something universal, not just in the startup world that I wish more people believed in.
- lhnn 15y agotag
- seancron 15y agoIf you want to bookmark an article on HN, you don't have to leave a comment for the purpose of tagging it. Just upvote the story. Then goto your profile and click on "Saved Stories." Every article that you've upvoted on HN will be there. Or you can bookmark the page using your browser/bookmarking service of your choice. Either way it's better than leaving a "tag" comment.
- lhnn 15y agoThank you. That's not quite an intuitive association, but my era of tagging is over.
- known 15y agoI agree with PG. We need to do http://www.netmba.com/strategy/swot/ http://www.netmba.com/strategy/swot/ and http://www.netmba.com/strategy/pest/ http://www.netmba.com/strategy/pest/ analysis before doing a startup.
- dkrich 15y agoI liked this interview, but I found myself siding with the dude at the computer more than anybody. I mean I fully agree that startups must and should improve lives to be viable. But then how are you in the same interview going to plug a website called "Hipmunk" that basically just displays flight info in a different way that to me doesn't really seem any more intuitive than Kayak? Flight search has been done. A billion times. Unless you are coming with some interesting new business model, you are just shuffling around existing information and wasting a lot of time and money. You aren't really improving anybody's lives or solving a real problem. Why not try to build something that really helps people do something they can't do now?
- kn0thing 15y agoYou've deftly avoided commenting on our mascot. This is just one year into hipmunk - there's more to come. But even a year in, think of all the hours we've liberated for flight/hotel searchers to do other more productive things (like read Hacker News -- OK, bad example).
- 6ren 15y agoIteration (aka trial-and-error) occurs on three levels, with feedback from users; to pivoting; and he's elsewhere said YC was initially a way to learn about angel investing, by having many investments, turning over quickly. Like geneticists studying fruit-flies - or Christensen studying the disk-drive market. One of the disappointing things he's elsewhere said they've learnt through this is that smartness is less important than they'd thought. I wonder why he's fallen back to "smart people" in this interview - maybe it's code for "good people". #5: http://www.paulgraham.com/really.html http://www.paulgraham.com/really.html http://www.paulgraham.com/founders.html http://www.paulgraham.com/founders.html