3 ms·
Good point. Standing back from any individual's point of view and thinking about the national consciousness for a moment: To be able to remember the British Em
by benjaminjosephw 6y ago
Good point. Standing back from any individual's point of view and thinking about the national consciousness for a moment:
To be able to remember the British Empire as anything other than a time of prosperity and progress is hard for the British. We believe that Britain has long been the hero of the story, as our very strong collective memory of the Second World War attests (minus our own atrocities of course). Coming to terms with our colonial past isn't something we're hardwired to be able to do easily as humans - our pride gets in the way. So we make whatever mental leaps we need to to fit the world of today into our preexisting faith in our own goodness and the goodness of our ancestors.
The intellectual dishonesty required to hide the evident reality of structural inequalities of race isn't that big of a jump for us to make but it's an important one to sooth our British pride. With a history of empire we need to make that leap - otherwise we would need to accept our responsibility for too many of the worlds problems - the immensity of our shame would be far too much to deal with. Instead, the problems of today have to be the sole responsibility of the people of today. If there are structural problems, they have to be categorized in ways that make it seem inevitable (poverty is a handy way out in that regard).
Race can't be acknowledged to be a big issue in the UK - the cost would be too great to our sense of self.
Similarly, Scotland can't be independent because that means us acknowledging the brutal history of English domination and oppression.
The pride of the British Empire has become a curse that we won't easily be free from.
- mytailorisrich 6y ago> the evident reality of structural inequalities of race It's not evident and in fact I disagree that there are structural inequalities so I'd be quite interested in examples.
- benjaminjosephw 6y agoAny modern social history text that describes social structures should be sufficient. Social power doesn't shift as quickly as we'd like to think it does and so any historical inequalities are bound to have impacts in present day society. I think the burden of proof is on you to show that past inequalities have been repaired as effectively as you claim they have. The magic formula for social transformation simply doesn't exist.
- mytailorisrich 6y agoIf you do not have examples then it is obviously much less evident than you claim. "Social power" does not imply structural prejudice. Likewise, any past inequalities that still have effects today do not imply structural issues today. Again, I disagree that there are structures in the UK that perpetuate racial inequalities. There are social constructs that tend to perpetuates social inequalities but there are not based on race.