4 ms·
> When you consider that until very recently, it was legal for NYPD officers to have sex with people in their custody That has nothing to do with the subject.
by TeeMassive 6y ago
> When you consider that until very recently, it was legal for NYPD officers to have sex with people in their custody
That has nothing to do with the subject.
- thereare5lights 6y agoOn the contrary, they're both things that should obviously be illegal. The question is why aren't things that should obviously be illegal not actually illegal. I answered that question. However, it seems like some people reflexively support the police so they don't read past the surface.
- TeeMassive 6y agoYour example is a glitch, of law, the other is obvious on its face.
- thereare5lights 6y ago> Your example is a glitch, of law, No it's not. In the past, it was lumped in with the right of cops to have sex with suspect, thus it was intentional to allow cops to catch sex workers. Calling it a glitch only shows how little people care about that particular problem and in fact reinforces my argument.