4 ms·
Well, to put it another way, why would you devote time towards a hypothetical violent emission of kinetic force from an explosive device when you could more imm
by bovermyer 6y ago
Well, to put it another way, why would you devote time towards a hypothetical violent emission of kinetic force from an explosive device when you could more immediately benefit from removing an intelligent obstacle by applying force with a blunt object?
E.g. - why research a gun when you could brain someone with a big rock?
Seriously, not trying to be condescending here - if you could probably do a thing more effectively down the road with one path, why would you choose a more immediate path?