It seems the issue with Ubiquiti here has potential wider implied for users of the equipment (signing keys compromised, cloud dependency giving remote managemen

It seems the issue with Ubiquiti here has potential wider implied for users of the equipment (signing keys compromised, cloud dependency giving remote management plane access). An individual vulnerability in a device is an issue but it gets patched. Hopefully it can't be exploited remotely. My biggest annoyance is when "infrastructure" ends up with outside connections in place (to the cloud or elsewhere), that breaks this model down (trusting the provider to mediate remote access, for example). They're a big single point of failure, and this incident really proves that.