I aggree with tx and Laurentvw, but (once again) Steve has missed the point. People who follow loads of links on digg and reddit are not high valued readers (m

I aggree with tx and Laurentvw, but (once again) Steve has missed the point. People who follow loads of links on digg and reddit are not high valued readers (maybe gullible enough to click on ads, but mostly college age geeks). He's on there because they are both a list of crap with catchy titles. People who read the times are a much different reader. If he was in nyt and had something worthwhile, I'm sure he would have seen value from the article (although maybe not in the form of click throughs on his ads). Since he doesn't produce anything new or interesting, it isn't likely to happen though.