3 ms·
> That doesn't sound as nefarious as the headline suggests. Why rule against it if it isn't a big deal? When is "too much security" a bad thing?
by MuffinFlavored 6y ago
> That doesn't sound as nefarious as the headline suggests.
Why rule against it if it isn't a big deal? When is "too much security" a bad thing?
- ralusek 6y agoI mean, a police officer in every bedroom wouldn't be great. Not saying that applies here, just thought your question was a strange hypothetical.
- MuffinFlavored 6y agoWho would it have hurt to have approved the request to put a camera on the box of ballots?
- ralusek 6y agoNobody, which is why I said my example didn't apply to the situation, but rather to the broader hypothetical.