3 ms·
It's the federal agency itself that you're accusing of impropriety here.
by lvs 6y ago
It's the federal agency itself that you're accusing of impropriety here.
- smsm42 6y agoOf course, it has been never the case that federal agents behaved improperly. In fact, once a person is hired by a federal government, they become incapable of committing a crime or even an impropriety. That's why no courts has ever convicted anyone working for a federal agency in anything inappropriate.
- JPKab 6y agoExactly. It's not like we have recent history of federal employees arresting the founder of the silk road and then concocting a conspiracy to steal hundreds of millions in Bitcoin from him for their own personal gain while hiding it from their agency, and then having employers so incompetent that they didn't realize this until an external watchdog discovered it..... Having worked in the federal government in the past I can assure you that the best rule of thumb to operate under is you can count on incompetence and you certainly can't count on the opposite.
- lvs 6y agoWhat are you on about? If the NLRB wanted to take action against this company for union busting, they have statutory tools at their disposal. What you're proposing is completely tinfoiled.
- smsm42 6y agoDescribing "having a webcam to ensure nobody tampers with the ballots" as "union busting" is extremely disingenuous, bordering on lying. And by "bordering" I mean I'm feeling very charitable today.
- lvs 6y agoUm, I think you put words in my mouth and, in doing so, entirely missed what I was saying.