3 ms·
> The licence ... is badly presented on Wiki Maybe don't pull images from Wikipedia for exactly this reason?
by Igelau 6y ago
> The licence ... is badly presented on Wiki
Maybe don't pull images from Wikipedia for exactly this reason?
- dna_polymerase 6y agoI'm all for attribution in this case it was basically user generated content. We deployed measures to avoid this in the future afterwards, nonetheless I still think the practice is predatory. If I had ripped some artist off his hard work, sure. But not naming the photographer of an half-assed picture submitted to an article with close to zero traffic, in order to lure some people into copying the picture for your own profit is just shady.