This piece is oddly copy-edited. Paragraph 7 refers to "the infamous hacker group" and paragraph 5 "the cyber-criminal gang", but both of these expressions are

This piece is oddly copy-edited. Paragraph 7 refers to "the infamous hacker group" and paragraph 5 "the cyber-criminal gang", but both of these expressions are serving as a pronoun reference to a previously named group. Then you look up to see if you missed the actual name of the hacking group, or even a link to the post, and... nope! Then below the headline "The New Normal", a second group is introduced as "another ransomware group". I assume "another ransomware group" is the group subsequently referred to as "the relatively new gang". Also, relative to whom or what? I am assuming the author of the piece originally named the groups or provided the detail you'd expect to have it make sense. Then editorial/legal spiked the names but did not copy-edit the rest of the piece to flow around the changes? I mention this because the article also weirdly edits around the nature or name of the firm targeted in the first story. Weird.