2 ms·
I was a contributor [0] to their second batch of photos (the first with user-generated content) when they initially launched under the name Ooomf because I love
by css 6y ago
I was a contributor [0] to their second batch of photos (the first with user-generated content) when they initially launched under the name Ooomf because I love the philosophy of open-source. They even published an open-source photography book [1], which I was featured in [2]. It is very cool to stumble across my images across the web.
The initial model was to receive a handful of user-generated photos, then handpick 10 each week and feature them [3]. I don't even see this feature page anymore.
However, we all know that once you sell, you lose control of the product. While on day one the service will still exist, I doubt it will be around with its current philosophy for much longer, especially since Getty has already stolen all my images from 500px that do not have people (so they can sell them without releases).
[0]: https://unsplash.com/@css https://unsplash.com/@css
[1]: https://book.unsplash.com/ https://book.unsplash.com/
[2]: https://unsplash.com/photos/bSmKli4OTIY https://unsplash.com/photos/bSmKli4OTIY
[3]: https://unsplash.com/collections/5/collection-%235%3A-crew https://unsplash.com/collections/5/collection-%235%3A-crew
- liveoneggs 6y agowhat were the license terms of the upload?
- css 6y agohttps://unsplash.com/license https://unsplash.com/license
- liveoneggs 6y agoThat is the license for downloading but does not specify what happens on uploading -- it appears photos uploaded to unsplash were given to unsplash, relinquishing all rights. The commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page) would have retained ownership.
- css 6y ago> it appears photos uploaded to unsplash were given to unsplash This is incorrect, according to section 6 of https://unsplash.com/terms https://unsplash.com/terms