4 ms·
I was specific: I understand the inverse reason and find it more valid and as such don't have nearly the size of a beef with it and therefore didn't mention it.
by brnt 6y ago
I was specific: I understand the inverse reason and find it more valid and as such don't have nearly the size of a beef with it and therefore didn't mention it.
I'm also not saying it's inherently wrong, I'm only saying that I find it sufficiently deep into suspicious territory to raise my guards. And I explained why I think that: because it lowers thresholds for committing abuse.
The young person in this scenario is not in the position of power after all.