> we gave them $200 billion to do this in 1996. Did we? I believe there's a compelling case that we did not, or at least a solid argument about whether that's

> we gave them $200 billion to do this in 1996. Did we? I believe there's a compelling case that we did not, or at least a solid argument about whether that's the case: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7709556 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7709556