3 ms·
I know about those. Since the whole point of innernet is making wireguard configuration simpler, I figured maybe integrating something like that is worth doing.
by afics 6y ago
I know about those. Since the whole point of innernet is making wireguard configuration simpler, I figured maybe integrating something like that is worth doing.
- clpwn 6y agoAh, gotcha - sorry I misunderstood your question. I feel that adding TCP support would push innernet beyond a WireGuard configuration manager and into something a bit more behemoth. I'm quite fond of the fact that innernet doesn't "touch the packets" in its current state. That said, if a strong need arises over time it's not out of the question, and in the mean time anybody is welcome to add their own wrapper around innernet or fork it to support that.
- afics 6y agoAye, noted. Do you support the case where nodes can not talk directly to each other and relaying is required?
- clpwn 6y agoNot currently, but I'm interested in supporting that.
- pdimitar 6y agoDo you feel Innernet could one day work through QUIC? It's kind of neither TCP nor UDP (although definitely much more UDP).