4 ms·
The military history of W was one of privilege and favoritism. No one disputes that.
by th0ma5 6y ago
The military history of W was one of privilege and favoritism. No one disputes that.
- adolph 6y agoSo it boils down to “fake but accurate” for you. Glad to establish your level of interest in evidence or lack thereof. I guess that’s a good posture to maintain one’s trust in media. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/15/us/the-2004-campaign-national-guard-memos-on-bush-are-fake-but-accurate.html https://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/15/us/the-2004-campaign-nati...
- th0ma5 6y agoYou posted first hand testimony from the person that would know LOL
- adolph 6y agoIs Mrs. Knox the person? From the article: HOUSTON, Sept. 14 - The secretary for the squadron commander purported to be the author of now-disputed memorandums questioning President Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard said Tuesday that she never typed the documents and believed that they are fakes. [...] Mrs. Knox, who was the secretary for the squadron at Ellington Air Force Base from 1957 to 1979, said she recalled Mr. Bush's case and the criticism of him because his record was so unusual. Mr. Killian had her type memorandums recording the problems, she said, and he kept them in a private file under lock and key. She said she had never voted for Mr. Bush, because she disliked his record in office. It is pretty easy to maintain trust in media if “fake but [maybe] accurate” is A-ok. Maybe it isn't even "fake but accurate" but "fake but fitting with my preconceptions and interest in self-delusion."
- th0ma5 6y agoAgain, you have no argument against his actual record being one of privilege and favoritism.