3 ms·
I don’t complain about how slow NBN Co was. I complain about the fact that it was meant to be FTTP instead of FTTN (premises vs node), and that the only reason
by roganartu 6y ago
I don’t complain about how slow NBN Co was. I complain about the fact that it was meant to be FTTP instead of FTTN (premises vs node), and that the only reason it didn’t end up that way is that the Liberal party said basically exactly what AT&T are here: that ADSL2 speeds are enough, and those last miles from the node to premise can be delivered over Telstra’s existing (horribly degraded and unmaintainable) copper network.
So, instead of 95% of the population having gigabit fibre, we have this hodgepodge of FTTP, FTTN with the last hop over 5G, and FTTN with the last hop over copper, all of which cost the same and which you get depends on when it was installed.
Don’t get me wrong, the NBN is certainly better now than the ADSL of old, but it ended up costing significantly more for the mess we have now than it would’ve if we’d successfully seen FTTP through from the start.
- Nursie 6y agoIs it bad? I'm moving out your way (specifically Perth) from the UK in a few months and have got really used to our gigabit connection. Last time I lived in Aus the NBN was just being kicked off, and I remember it getting downgraded by the liberals. Has it just never caught up?
- sumedh 6y agoIn some areas its bad but in most atleast metro areas its good. You can check what kind of Tech your address has in the NBN website.