4 ms·

Does that matter? Tremendously. Just as the Robinhood CEO and watch videos on the mechanics of why they did what they did. Then come back here and hang your he

Does that matter? Tremendously. Just as the Robinhood CEO and watch videos on the mechanics of why they did what they did. Then come back here and hang your head in shame. Lucky thanks to trust and centralization it can be resolved instead of lost forever. It's the centralized systems of disparate parties which causes this. You clearly don't know what you're talking about here.

arcticbull 6y ago
> Tremendously. Just as the Robinhood CEO and watch videos on the mechanics of why they did what they did. Then come back here and hang your head in shame. I'm very familiar with that situation, lol, no need to get hyperbolic. A small tweak to liquidity requirements is all that's needed to rectify that. Not burning the whole system down. This reads a lot like the engineering preoccupation with rewriting instead of refactoring because reading code is hard and writing it is easy. > It's the centralized systems of disparate parties which causes this. You clearly don't know what you're talking about here. No, I'm saying that decentralized systems leave no recourse to correct errors. SFYL. Centralized systems do. When you speak with such hyperbole and unbridled, untempered enthusiasm it raises questions about your answers. Especially when the system you espouse has had no end of issues, of bigger magnitude, constantly. Robinhood just taking that opportunity to exit scam or shut down would have been "just another day" in crypto. At least Vlad didn't fly off to India to open an orphanage, fake his own death and tell everyone to get stuffed. The entire space is one step from collapse at all times haha. None of that changes what I said: a non-blockchain solution that's new, clean and modern would do just as much good as a new blockchain solution. Possibly more. And definitely more efficiently. Why approach this from the solution domain instead of the problem domain?

arcticbull 6y ago

> Tremendously. Just as the Robinhood CEO and watch videos on the mechanics of why they did what they did. Then come back here and hang your head in shame. I'm very familiar with that situation, lol, no need to get hyperbolic. A small tweak to liquidity requirements is all that's needed to rectify that. Not burning the whole system down. This reads a lot like the engineering preoccupation with rewriting instead of refactoring because reading code is hard and writing it is easy. > It's the centralized systems of disparate parties which causes this. You clearly don't know what you're talking about here. No, I'm saying that decentralized systems leave no recourse to correct errors. SFYL. Centralized systems do. When you speak with such hyperbole and unbridled, untempered enthusiasm it raises questions about your answers. Especially when the system you espouse has had no end of issues, of bigger magnitude, constantly. Robinhood just taking that opportunity to exit scam or shut down would have been "just another day" in crypto. At least Vlad didn't fly off to India to open an orphanage, fake his own death and tell everyone to get stuffed. The entire space is one step from collapse at all times haha. None of that changes what I said: a non-blockchain solution that's new, clean and modern would do just as much good as a new blockchain solution. Possibly more. And definitely more efficiently. Why approach this from the solution domain instead of the problem domain?