I like the article, but it is kind of badly written. > It’s no secret that Intel has stumbled lately... How so? If you're going to assert something, explain w

I like the article, but it is kind of badly written. > It’s no secret that Intel has stumbled lately... How so? If you're going to assert something, explain what you mean. This is too ambiguous. We might know how they've stumbled, or we might have different ideas about how than the author, or we might not be in the loop. Give some background, explain your assertions. >Intel has never licensed its x86 CPU designs (well, not for a really long time)... So not never then. Then why say never in the first place? Just a couple of examples. The article gives you a feel for what's changing at Intel, but it uses a lot of cruft that take away from the information itself and doesn't really give you a full picture.