several points: 1)this article seems to be a bit low on actual, solid facts. But ok. 2)I wouldn't trust a single word that anyone who is paid by Amazon to twe

several points: 1)this article seems to be a bit low on actual, solid facts. But ok. 2)I wouldn't trust a single word that anyone who is paid by Amazon to tweet, tweets. 3)As long as said employees identify themselves openly, as the article claims, no problem. If they pretend to be separate we have an issue. 3) Will this union really force everyone to pay dues? If it's true, that's a bit strange. I thought that kind of thing was 1970s stuff by now. So interesting article. But as far as Amazon using twitter as a propoganda tool? It sounds pretty benign stuff to my little mind.