I certainly agree with you on all those points, and I regret the somewhat conspiratorial implications I made. I definitely acknowledge that a large percentage o

I certainly agree with you on all those points, and I regret the somewhat conspiratorial implications I made. I definitely acknowledge that a large percentage of MIT faculty (and students) very likely don't share this view. Something about the slanted, biased tone of the article just really rubbed me the wrong way, whether or not it's a case of it solely being the opinion of this one writer and they just don't happen to have other cybersecurity writers, or a case of the paper having had this slant in general for a long time, or the unsubstantiated (and I think unlikely) case that any powerful people at MIT itself somehow had a direct role in the article being published or that the writer independently felt they had to toe the line with such people.