3 ms·
But that isn't the issue at question. If the TTL is 300 seconds or 3600 seconds and the JVM holds onto it for three weeks, you can't blame a TTL of 3600 seconds
by squiggleblaz 6y ago
But that isn't the issue at question. If the TTL is 300 seconds or 3600 seconds and the JVM holds onto it for three weeks, you can't blame a TTL of 3600 seconds for that, and setting the TTL down to 0 seconds at all isn't going to fix it either (unless, bizarrely, the JVM developers decided to respect TTLs of 0-60 and treat all other values as infinite).