I kind of feel like cancel culture minimizes the issue by allowing people to talk not effect while completely skirting around the cause. Saying was he was remo

I kind of feel like cancel culture minimizes the issue by allowing people to talk not effect while completely skirting around the cause. Saying was he was removed due to public backlash due to history of sexist behavior, and discrimination is much hard to defend then the reductive was cancelled. EDIT The recent Suess books case is kind of a prime example of this. Since cancelled doesn't have a strict definition saying the books were cancelled arguably not entirely wrong. But misses the who, what, & why of it. (e.g the publisher stopped printing select low selling books that included offensive outdated stereotypes)