4 ms·
Why is there a pendulum? Aren't both necessary and two sides of the same coin? I know little of modern AI, but I've seen work where both low level raw power f
by colordrops 6y ago
Why is there a pendulum? Aren't both necessary and two sides of the same coin? I know little of modern AI, but I've seen work where both low level raw power for NNs is combined with a symbolic organization of many NNs.
- ghaff 6y agoTo some degree. But an enormous part of the (useful but narrow) success of AI is a specific set of ML tech, especially supervised learning. And the amount of computational horsepower and data required gives one at least some pause given what the human brain can do with apparently so much less. Which implies there are probably significant advances required in cognitive science and neurophysiology and perhaps other fields of studies we haven't even considered. We may need other ways to solve problems that have proven more elusive to brute force than it looked like 5 years or so ago (e.g. general purpose full self-driving in busy cities).
- nextos 6y agoDo you have any references to that work?
- heuroci 6y agoI personally designed and participated in the implementation of a hybrid cognitive architecture which combined both NNs and GOFAI. We (http://www.heurolabs.com http://www.heurolabs.com) are contemplating open sourcing it, or at least publish the design documents