Some great logic there. Put it on the one party to give into anything the other wants, because they're said to be important. Does it work the other way in you

Some great logic there. Put it on the one party to give into anything the other wants, because they're said to be important. Does it work the other way in your mind too? If we all agreed that air traffic or say, Amazon, were a critical resource and has to run efficiently and for the country's benefit, not individuals, that means that they get to put whatever conditions on labor they like? This is the worst kind of approach to governing ever, if it can even be called that.