4 ms·
I think I got mislead by the original comment - thank you for explaining that to me. I don't have a horse in e-ink race, but the interesting patent I came acro
by varispeed 6y ago
I think I got mislead by the original comment - thank you for explaining that to me.
I don't have a horse in e-ink race, but the interesting patent I came across recently is this one:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170060527A1/en https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170060527A1/en
It's a good example how obvious things get patented these days.
Essentially if you want to do a circuit simulation of an electronic device, to make it more realistic you of course want to simulate real world values of components and not the nominal ones in the schematic.
Someone else who I showed it to said that they essentially patented Monte Carlo method...
- fortran77 6y agoBut we're talking about e-Ink displays here, and not "Digital emulation of an analog device with tolerance modeling" And every time there's an e-Ink thread here, a chorus of people chime in and say "Damn Patents! If it weren't for patents, and that pesky U.S. Constitution, everyone would have e-Ink!"