3 ms·
>A strike, by definition, cannot be illegal. That includes armed forces and every federal employee. Wrong. A strike, by definition, as actually defined in fede
by throwaway0x1 6y ago
>A strike, by definition, cannot be illegal. That includes armed forces and every federal employee.
Wrong. A strike, by definition, as actually defined in federal law, can indeed be illegal. That includes armed forces and every federal employee.
- fishtacos 6y agoA strike, by definition, cannot be illegal. It's an established form of protest which may or may not lead to firing. Despite the results of the strike, the protest itself is not illegal, nor is walking out of a job. At least from both a moral standpoint.
- fishtacos 6y ago*At least from a moral standpoint.
- throwaway0x2 6y ago>A strike, by definition, cannot be illegal. Wrong. A strike, by definition, as actually defined in federal law, can indeed be illegal. >It's an established form of protest which may or may not lead to firing. Wrong. It's an established form of protest which may or may not result in criminal fillings because it is illegal federally for federal employees. >Despite the results of the strike, the protest itself is not illegal, nor is walking out of a job. Despite the results of the strike, the protest itself is illegal, as is walking out of federal jobs (in a strike). You literally can't be any more wrong.