4 ms·
Zerodium say they have nothing to do with this: https://twitter.com/cBekrar/status/1376469666084757506 https://twitter.com/cBekrar/status/1376469666084757506
by Denvercoder9 6y ago
Zerodium say they have nothing to do with this: https://twitter.com/cBekrar/status/1376469666084757506 https://twitter.com/cBekrar/status/1376469666084757506
- tester34 6y ago>Likely, the researcher(s) who found this bug/exploit tried to sell it to many entities but none wanted to buy this crap but why so snarky?
- pas 6y agotwitter. the takes are hotter than the sun, the style is snarkier than zkSNARKs.
- mvolfik 6y agoam I understanding it correctly that somebody had breached the PHP git server and tried selling it to 0-day and similar exploiting businesses?
- Sebb767 6y agoThat was my assumption given that they explicitly mentioned zerodium. But so far only the commit itself is public, so until we know more about the attack or the attacker, this is pure speculation. The tweet from zerodium is not clear on whether they received an offer for this vulnerability, unfortunately.
- lawl 6y ago> Zerodium say they have nothing to do with this Would they admit if they did?
- fernandotakai 6y ago"zerodium investigated zerodium and zerodium found out that zerodium had nothing to do with this"
- kuroguro 6y agoWell the opposite may be true too - the comment may be lying about it having anything to do with zerodium or that date. Could be just a meme or a bad attempt of misdirection in case it went undetected for a while.
- Sebb767 6y agoThat's unknown, but it would be strange for them to be involved - it would not make much sense for them to pay out a bounty to themselves. I think it's far more likely that someone tried to plant this there in order to cash out via zerodium.
- tutfbhuf 6y agoMaybe the person that reported the exploit to Zerodium already cashed out in mid 2017 and was angry that the exploit hasn't been fixed yet. Therefore, he decided to make it very obvious and force php to react.
- Angius 6y agoI believe the exploit itself was introduced with the commit in question, it wasn't there before.