4 ms·
I definitely haven't "switched". In fact, I have a key binding for escaping to emacs to work on the current source. I find that useful because emacs kbd macros
by geophile 6y ago
I definitely haven't "switched". In fact, I have a key binding for escaping to emacs to work on the current source. I find that useful because emacs kbd macros are so much less clunky than the Jetbrains equivalent. But yes, Jetbrains products have taken over much of what I used to do in emacs.
- bo0tzz 6y ago> I have a key binding for escaping to emacs to work on the current source. Are you aware that you can set the Jetbrains editor to use emacs key bindings?
- gimboland 6y agoNot OP but they're not saying they want to use emacs keybindings, they're saying they want to use emacs keyboard macros [1], which I agree really are a very handy feature having no equivalent in JetBrains. [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Keyboard-Macros.html https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Ke...
- geophile 6y agoEmacs keyboard macros have an inferior equivalent in Intellij (and, I'm assuming, their other products). But also, emacs just somehow feels faster. Maybe keystrokes are marginally faster, maybe it's my expectations, but there it is. I know that Intellij has emacs key bindings, that's not the issue, I'm happy with the Intellij default bindings.
- geophile 6y agoOh, wait, I just figured out part of it. In Jetbrains products, I am CONSTANTLY hitting Esc to Tab to deal with the helpful predictive suggestion. I find that feature sometimes useful, so I have not turned it off. But it definitely produces a different and maybe slower experience than typing in emacs. Maybe there is a mental mode switch between typing and handling the hint?