3 ms·
and what is the problem with that? "Single guy made a good looking and so far working product in only 59 commits since september" is a different way to present
by shuringai 6y ago
and what is the problem with that?
"Single guy made a good looking and so far working product in only 59 commits since september" is a different way to present the same facts.
- crazypython 6y agoMinimalist web frameworks are better in my opinion. Less code that can break, less friction between you and DOM.
- tomcam 6y agoDid GP say there was a problem?
- el_dev_hell 6y agoLanguage is so interesting. You read the parent comment and took it as throwing shade. I read the parent comment and took it as pragmatic admiration.
- erklik 6y agoHonestly, I also took it as throwing shade. I had to read the whole thing and realised that GP clearly wasn't throwing shade. I am wondering why I initially thought that. Maybe a mindset of inherently better software created by Teams that's instilled within us these days could be a part of it. Trusting a lone programmer, it's harder because you have to reject the "programming".
- scambier 6y agoI think it's because of several points that can be interpreted as good or bad: - "relatively new project" > code is fresh and certainly well-organized / maybe lacks stability - "all by one person" > a single vision is a good thing / if that person gives up the project, it's dead - "no other project mentions it" > [no good aspect in that] / no real-world usage If you have any experience in the frontend field, those points are more often bad than good. You don't want to invest time and/or money in that kind of project that has a high chance of being dead within a year. Now, that does not mean that it's a bad project (it looks pretty good actually), but it's just very young. Edit: actually I like this framework very much (but I have a thing for underdogs). It might be ideal to quickly throw POCs or toy projects